Evaluation for a Middle School Special Ed. Teacher
Example teacher evaluation: CALIFORNIA EDITION.
Introduction
This evaluation aims to assess the performance of a middle school special education teacher based on California’s Professional Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP). The evaluation will focus on 1-2 observations of a lesson.
CSTP Standards
The CSTP consists of seven standards that guide effective teaching practices. Let’s explore how these standards apply to our evaluation:
Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning
The teacher should create an inclusive and supportive learning environment for all students, including those with special needs.
Observation Focus: Observe how the teacher differentiates instruction to meet diverse student needs.
Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning
The teacher should establish a positive classroom climate that promotes learning and growth.
Observation Focus: Assess the teacher’s classroom management strategies and organization.
Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning
The teacher should have a deep understanding of the subject matter and adapt it to students’ needs.
Observation Focus: Evaluate the teacher’s content knowledge and instructional materials.
Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students
The teacher should plan engaging lessons that align with curriculum standards.
Observation Focus: Review the lesson plan and observe its implementation.
Assessing Student Learning
The teacher should use various assessment methods to gauge student progress.
Observation Focus: Observe how the teacher assesses student understanding during the lesson.
Developing as a Professional Educator
The teacher should engage in continuous professional development.
Observation Focus: Discuss the teacher’s professional growth activities.
Collaborating with Colleagues, Parents, and the Community
The teacher should collaborate with colleagues, involve parents, and engage with the community.
Observation Focus: Assess the teacher’s communication and collaboration skills.
Rubric for Evaluation
Based on the CSTP standards, here’s a simplified rubric for evaluating the middle school special education teacher:
Performance Levels:
Emerging (1): Needs significant improvement.
Developing (2): Shows progress but requires further growth.
Proficient (3): Demonstrates competence in most areas.
Exemplary (4): Goes above and beyond, consistently exceeding expectations.
Observations:
Lesson Planning and Delivery:
Emerging: Lesson lacks clear objectives and differentiation.
Developing: Objectives are present, but differentiation needs improvement.
Proficient: Well-structured lesson with clear objectives and differentiation.
Exemplary: Engaging lesson that caters to diverse learners.
Classroom Management:
Emerging: Disruptive behavior is not effectively addressed.
Developing: Some management strategies are effective.
Proficient: Consistent management techniques maintain a positive environment.
Exemplary: Skillful management fosters a respectful and focused class.
Assessment Practices:
Emerging: Limited use of formative assessment.
Developing: Some formative assessments are employed.
Proficient: Regular formative assessments inform instruction.
Exemplary: Varied assessments provide valuable insights.
Professional Growth:
Emerging: Minimal engagement in professional development.
Developing: Attends workshops or conferences occasionally.
Proficient: Actively seeks professional learning opportunities.
Exemplary: Takes leadership roles and contributes to the profession.
Collaboration and Communication:
Emerging: Limited collaboration with colleagues and parents.
Developing: Collaborates occasionally.
Proficient: Engages in regular collaboration.
Exemplary: Builds strong partnerships with colleagues, parents, and the community.
Conclusion
This evaluation provides a framework for assessing the middle school special education teacher’s performance. It emphasizes growth, collaboration, and student-centered practices. The teacher’s commitment to continuous improvement will contribute to student success.